The situations I have in mind are familiar ones. If a defendant uses a plaintiff’s dock to save his ship in a storm, the defendant will be liable to compensate her for the resulting damage, although the trespass was entirely reasonable.262 If a defendant reasonably decides to conduct some ultrahazardous blasting in order to demolish an abandoned shack and build a new house on her land, and foreseeably ends up injuring her neighbor as a result, the neighbor will be able to recover.263 If a defendant runs a small business, and hires and trains a new employee who negligently causes a customer to suffer harm a few weeks into the job, the defendant will be liable to the customer even if she cannot be accused of any fault in hiring, training, or supervising the employee.264 The doctrines that secure recovery in these cases are familiar features of tort law.
承压之下，近年来，一些地方法院以“诉前调解”为名，行“拖延立案、变相审查”之实。一些案件久调不决、久调难立，“立案难”出现反弹回潮风险。
，这一点在免实名服务器中也有详细论述
丹尼尔·西格尔，《心智的本质》，湛庐文化，2021
blog feed add https://www.justinmklam.com
这就衍生出AI无法真正主导创作的第三个矛盾点：AI在试图替代创作者，但编剧只希望AI成为辅助工具。